http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/732364.shtml
However, my more provocative and critical comments were exorcised and so I publish my brief reply to the journalist here.
The fact that official newspapers like the People's Daily and
government institutions like Xinhua have opened Weibo accounts is very
interesting, exciting and reveals a lot about what is happening in Chinese
attitudes towards the information space. We have a saying in English: 'If you
can't beat them, jon them,' and governments all over the world - including
authoritarian governments like China - are quickly learning that it is
preferable to engage with the information space rather than remain outside or
try to control it. They are also learning that today politics is about the
competition of narratives, and so by launching Weibo accounts the Chinese
government understands that it must try to spin the narrative. While controls
still exist - the Great Firewall is still an important method for the Chinese
state to manage the internet and its use (and remember that the media in China
have been subject to far greater and tighter controls under Hu Jintao and Wen
Jiabao) - thinking about, shaping and managing the story and its interpretation
is far more effective. Weibo and other social media allow for genuine dialogue,
and it will be interesting to see whether the People's Daily and Xinhua (ie the
Chinese state) uses Weibo as a genuine platform for more discussion with
Chinese civil society, or whether Weibo becomes simply another vehicle of
Communist propaganda. Weibo is a wonderful site for creative subversion by the
Chinese people and is fast becoming a space where criticism of the government is
voiced and civil society is mobilised. What will happen if this voice becomes
too loud or the users are mobilised in a political way that reminds us of the
so-called Arab Spring in 2011? At that time we saw that the government will
still use old-fashioned methods of coercion and control to close Weibo and
manage discussion on it. There is no reason why the state would not use its
authority in the same way in the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment